The Day Science Died

Last week (in the blog post, Einstein, the Electric Universe and Expatriation) I made mention that after a day of Googling and YouTubing I had come across the concept of the Electric Universe.  In that post, I mentioned that I failed Physics in Grade 10... no big surprise, though.  I never went to child prison.  I realized what it was at an early age.

However, as a generally curious person who likes to think about how the world and the universe works, I never caught on to a lot of the cosmology of today.  As I mentioned before, it didn't seem to make a lot of sense to me.  That was why, when I found the video on the electric universe, and it made a lot more sense than what I knew about cosmology, I quickly picked up to it.

The exact same process basically happened to me with economics.  I remember thinking that most of what I heard from so-called authorities like central banks and governments didn't make much sense.  So, I ignored it.  Until, one day, I came across Austrian economics and in a very short period of time, everything made perfect sense.

So, it came as a very big surprise to me  that of all the articles I have written, the article about the Electric Universe had the most direct feedback of any of them.  My email box was nearly full.  There were a variety of emails including some who wanted to point out that Robin Hood was actually a libertarian/anarchist figure who "stole" the money back from the government of the time (the King) to give to the people.  I admitted that that may very well have been the original point of Robin Hood, but Hollywood has unfortunately turned it into a socialist indoctrination system.

Other emails came directly from some of the founders of the Electric Universe concept, inviting me to a conference they will be having in Las Vegas in January - an invitation I accepted very humbly!

But the great majority of emails were from people who already knew about the Electric Universe or who found out about it through my post and who were excited about it.

One email I received in particular is quite insightful as to how the college and university bureaucracies of today have hindered the science itself.  Much as how I always state that places like Harvard and Princeton have been destroying economics under the false Keynesian banner for decades, it appears the same thing has been going on in the field of physics.

It makes one wonder if there is anything close to truth and reality emanating from these "institutions" and further shows my belief that the entire school system and structure has become much more detrimental than positive in our lives today (see more here: Debtucation).

Here is the email from a TDV reader on the state of Physics in the world today.  It has many great insights including his view that all of the problems we face in the world today with government and lack of freedom are all the same forces that have been destroying the sciences. 

------------

Jeff,

Thanks for your insightful article today.  It both pains and pleases me that you have seen the light on what is nothing short of a highjacking of the truth in the physics community.  Special relativity, quantum mechanics, the gravitational model, and of course String Theory have gifted us with a nearly 100 year standstill in the field of physics.  They have come to represent the bureaucratic establishment in the field of physics and like all bureaucracies have obstructed progress, truth, and any significant study outside the fray of these “commandment theories”.

The story of how should sound very familiar. Once physics was a true pursuit.  An ocean of possibilities for understanding and taking control of our world.   Innovators like Einstein, Bohr, Feynmann, Planck, LeVoisseur and Shroedinger made quantum leaps (pardon the pun) towards our understanding of the nature of matter, energy and the universe.  But when these discoveries in turn led to rampant industrial advancement, development of powerful weapons, and social progress, they also resulted in the requisite institutional establishment seeking to protect their interests in the former areas.

Because modern physics was such a revolution, returning tangible benefits and wealth, many scientists rushed to understand that which these pioneers had set forth.  A logical course of events followed. The first was that Einstein, et al no longer needed a job.  They became historical icons, guests of the state, and gods in the scientific world.  As a result those in the idea market, specifically folks like Harvard, Yale, MIT, etc saw that their product, curriculum, needed these types of ideas in order to remain competitive.  So in lieu of the impossible task of getting one of these ‘gods’ to accept a menial professor position, they went out and hired those most studied in their theories.

This was the day that science died.  You see the difference between Einstein, and the person most studied in Einstein’s theories is that Einstein is a scientist and his devotee is a copycat.  Though you probably have no experience in this if you are under 100 years old, science is actually about DISCOVERY, not memorizing the incomplete theories of scientists who came before you.  And the fact is Einstein, Shroedinger, Feynmann etc were brilliant, their theories, revolutionary, but they were not free from error, nor themselves end-all-be-all answers to the questions of the universe.

So rather than take the wonderful foundations that these men gave us for a new enlightenment in the field of physics, their ideas were instead packaged as a commodity product for universities to hock as long as there was a market for them.  You can probably guess where things went from there. 

“Oh you have a new theory that CORRECTS the theories of EINSTEIN being taught at MIT and YALE?  HA!  And who are YOU?”  

You see Einstein was so smart it was self defeating.  He set the bar so high, that few have come along with the intellect and abilities to individually produce comparable advancements to the study of physics.  And from a scientific standpoint that is OK.  Science DEPENDS on most scientists dedicating a lifetime to advancing a single idea a single step.  This is the reality of true scientific discovery.  But with an scientific bureaucracy offering much better pay and more prestige for promoting Einstein’s cult of personality, most have traded the pure pursuit of enlightenment for the easy life of selling an obsolete product at a high markup.

As a result we have spent 100 years pursuing the same dead ends that Einstein and Shroedinger ran into, while justifying every failure with the consolation that at least we are wearing the most popular brands.  It is another sad case of rent seeking bureaucrats trading something pure and universally enriching for lining their own pockets with a sure buck that they can recycle in perpetuity. 

You may be surprised to learn that this neutrino is only the latest hammer to fall on the flawed assumptions of general relativity.  NASA Astronomers have for years witnessed particles being ejected from supernovas at many times the speed of light.  Forget a difference of 60 nanoseconds, were talking about MULTIPLES of C.  Yet rather than believe their own eyes they concoct ridiculous theories about dark matter and corollaries about gravitational behavior so as not to betray the gospel.

Want a good laugh?  Ask any Ivy League professor why comets have tails.  Is the comet traveling faster than the light trailing behind it?  That would be blasphemy save for the fact that this is clearly what everybody sees.  Of course the electric model explains this perfectly.  Conductive material passing through the web of electrical potential in deep space creates a continuous spark as it disrupts the potential gradient it traverses.  Its middle school science, we see it with our own eyes, yet WE’RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BELIEVE IT.

You were probably taught in school that the sun is made of plasma which is exceedingly dense and a fingernail-sized piece of sun matter would weigh as much as Mount Everest.  I know I was.   Then I got my first job in a chemical lab, doing metals analysis.  We used an instrument called ICP (Ion Chromatography by PLASMA) to separate metals in solutions.  The instrument sat neatly on a tabletop, contained a plasma generating ion source, yet weighed about 75 lbs.  When I asked the Ph.D. lab director why it didn’t weigh a million million tons, she looked at me like I was from another planet.

I got the same response when I asked the same question of another Ph.D. while operating cyclotrons at another job, where we cooked heavy water in a plasma beam to form Fluoride (which of course is Alchemy, another thing that supposedly doesn’t exist).   

 Anyway this is getting a little long but I appreciated your article and wanted to give you a little perspective.  I wish I could tell you that the reason that science is ruined is not the same reason our entire society, government, constitution and concept of liberty is ruined but unfortunately it is.

Bureaucrats, rent seekers, and copycats have conspired to ruin perhaps the best chance we’ve ever had of achieving a new level of enlightenment, comfort and intellect.  They have sold us junkscience that is tragically wrong, and defended only through the safety of numbers.  Numbers bought at the cost of genuine scientific inquiry and the scientific process itself.  EVERYBODY IS WRONG.  The electric universe theory fills in all the gaps of the laughable theories in vogue for the last 100 years.  But until it can justify the cost of a multibillion dollar supercollider or Universities admitting to selling an obsolete product at premium prices, it will remain behind the curtain.  Sad but typical. Thanks for at least giving me hope that there are still a few free thinkers out there…

Regards,

Derek Donohue

Box Scientific

Comments

[mike]

a must read to understand the REAL world is WORLDS IN COLLISION 1950 best seller until...
author IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY

[Joe]

Your friend is confused. No one claims that plasma is condensed matter. He is thinking of the material that neutron-stars are made of. The idea is simple. Oridinary matter has a nucleus and electrons orbiting relatively far away. Analogy: a soccer ball (nucleus) on the 50 yard line and the lighter electrons orbiting at a distance comperable to the stadium's seats. So the atom is mostly empty. Now picture the whole stadium filled with soccer balls. This is condensed matter.
Plasmas are so hot that the electrons no longer orbit a nucleus, they are driven about so that the attraction of the nuclei has little effect.

That picture of Einstein is disgusting. Anyone that would pose for a picture like that is off. Einstein was also a woman-abuser, fortunately his relatives just make bagels. Look closely...see any Neanderthal characteristics??? The light-speed limit is his invention, so why all the adoration???

[Joe]

'Much as how I always state that places like Harvard and Princeton have been destroying economics under the false Keynesian banner for decades, it appears the same thing has been going on in the field of physics.'

Brilliant point. I am studying a Business based degree at Durham University in the UK, if I said the words 'fiat currency' or 'fractional reserve banking system' all I would get is confused looks from my peers. It's worse than you think, the majority of business/finance/economics students trundle through University without questioning the statist viewpoint or even understanding the fraud of central banking, let alone being taught anything different...

[Mark]

Very interesting post. String theory is Very interesting - there are quite a few documentaries on it that seem plausible.

[StacyG]

Well, Derek, comets display tail because there is a tail of gas, and not a trailing light behind them. There is no need to resort to mystique explanations to prove the point that mainstream science is VERY biased. Even so, comets have a lot of frozen elements that are capable of going into gaseous state when heated up. As comet approaches a star, it starts being heated up, just the same as you feel the warmth of sunlight on your own face, and those elements go to gaseous state. While doing so, they are expanding in volume in all direction, mostly in front of the comet where sunlight is. However, the comet moves on and "catches up with most of the stuff, pushing it aside and forming the head. The molecules left behind, slowly disperse in space, which is why the tail is thinning with passage of time, just like the contrail.

Now, where did you read that the conventional science explains comet tail as "light dragging behind a comet that moves faster than light"? I am no insisting that the light speed is the absolute limit, but what an awful application of an acceptable premise that is!

Secondly, I don't know where you took your physics, but the plasma in your plasma generator (say a fingertip much) and the plasma that may-be part of the sun is similar, except that the one on sun is compressed by the gravity of the sun while yours is compressed by the gravity of the earth.

Jeff, this is not your best post. While mainstream is definitely biased because we know that they lie through their teeth all the time, bringing a witness like this doesn't help your case. It's like arguing for 911 truth by saying that a whole wing can not fit into a hole, - it makes your case weaker!

Einstein is long disproved. Lookup "sombrero galaxy". Besides, he didn't invent anything. Just another case of AWESOME government worker who failed everything he could only to magically start to blossom once he got himself on government paycheck of united states. Be more skeptical. He is no different than Lee Harvey Oswald.

[Derek D]

So to set everyone's mind at ease, let me clarify a few things. My e-mail to Jeff was somewhat of a rant not a scientific treatise. It was mostly to speak to how science has become a bureaucracy. My illustrations are not any assertion of what I believe to be true. I am a nuclear physicist and understand the different states of plasma. My point was that even some more 'educated', self proclaimed experts couldn't put them into context for me. Note that two posts here on the topic give differing explanations as well. Same thing with comets. Ask a kid to draw a comet and he will draw an object with light trailing behind it. This was my claim: this is what we SEE. I didn't claim to know the exact answer, only that there is more than one equally good explanation. To be sure the explanation offered above is wrong because it violates principles of momentum in the vaccuum of space. In a vacuum there is no net force preventing the emanating gases from continuing to travel as fast as the comet itself. Gas molecules emanating from a comet would first be drawn to the gravity of the comet itself and the gravity that was mobilizing the comet. With all of this happening in a vacuum there is nothing that would predict trailing or tailing except some additional phenomenon which may be electrical or may not. Again I don't claim to know for sure, I was only saying that there are other explanations that fit as well. I should also note that Einsteinian Relativity states that matter traveling at speeds of C will attain infinite mass. The neutrino at CERN did no such thing.

As I told Jeff in a follow-up this is not to say that there is not good science or good scientists. Most science is very good and most scientists are doing the best they can with the tools they have. But they are trapped between foundations that have flaws and an orthodoxy that won't accept certain ideas outside the fray even when they hold equal merits. And sadly money, power and reputation are the key reasons.

I'll leave you with this in the context of Jeff's original post on neutrinos exceeding C. We see, and thus understand our world, through light hitting our eyes. We do science by observation and we build scientific instrumentation on principles founded on the idea of C being the speed limit of all things. Thus the very simple and very scientific conclusion then is that anything traveling faster than light is simply INVISIBLE to us. So the only thing we have ever PROVEN is that C represents the limit of US and our science, not the universe. I make no claim to be the guy with the answers or the guy you should believe. Quite to the contrary, I'm echoing the true message of science. BELIEVE NOTHING WITHOUT INDISPUTABLE PROOF!